Color Me Surprised June 30, 2010
Posted by Benjamin Wendell in Entertainment, Scandals.Tags: Kate Gosselin, nude, playboy, Vienna Girardi
add a comment
Vienna Girardi Posing For Playboy
Well, what else was she going to do once her application for a doctorate in astrophysics at MIT was rejected? If this doesn’t work out, there’s always jello wrestling with Kate Gosselin. Hey, a girl’s got to make a living somehow.
BW
Oh Baby! Who’s Your Daddy? June 30, 2010
Posted by Benjamin Wendell in News Of The Weird.Tags: court, screaming, sex
5 comments
Sometimes I just sit down on a bench at the mall, watch the passersby, and wonder how we, as a species, continue to reproduce. Here’s a prime example: Noisy sex woman spared jail term – And Finally, Frontpage – Independent.ie If you read that headline and had visions of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt swinging from the trapezes in the French villa, think again:

I’m guessing that most of the screams were things like, “Can’t these damned lights go any lower??” I’m just sayin’…
BW
Release My Chakra June 30, 2010
Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.1 comment so far
I look at it differently- could anyone actually make that up?
It’s A Hundred Bucks More For A Happy Ending June 30, 2010
Posted by Benjamin Wendell in Politics, Scandals.Tags: al gore, escort, masseuse, sexual assault
add a comment
That article on Al Gore and the masseuse is pretty damning stuff, and just like similar pieces on other politicians in The Star and The Enquirer, may very well turn out to be true. Even if it’s only partially true, it certainly sheds a little light on why Tipper might have decided that forty years was plenty, thank you very much. But the accusations in the report also force one to accept that Al Gore, who is not only a Nobel laureate but a billionaire, is also a complete idiot. With one phone call to any of hundreds of escort services listed in the yellow pages of every major city in America, he could have had a massage with a happy ending, or a wide variety of other services, up to and including an orgy featuring Russian acrobats and French dwarves. All he needed was a credit card. Instead, we are asked to believe that he chose to force himself on an unsuspecting professional masseuse with pleas of “Release my chakra”? I’m a little skeptical.
BW
Geezers Rule! June 30, 2010
Posted by Benjamin Wendell in reader interaction.4 comments
Well, my young colleague once again beat me to the punch. I guess the reflexes are just a bit quicker at 56 than 57. Some things never change, though. I’m the elder statesman of the group and I still get no respect. Happy freaking birthday to the both of us…and oh yeah, happy six days since birth to the most gorgeous grandson in the history of babies (if that doesn’t clinch my geezerdom, nothing will.)
BW
Just Suck It Up! June 30, 2010
Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.add a comment
This gives new meaning to “taking one for the team”
HFB! June 30, 2010
Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.add a comment
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO US
Two old geezers – but I continue to remain one year younger than old Gramps.
Remember How The Bush White House Politicized Science? June 29, 2010
Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.add a comment
Apparently they weren’t the only ones:
From NRO (Shannon Coffen):
It seems that the most important statement in the famous position paper of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists—a 1996 document that was central to the case of partial-birth-abortion defenders for the subsequent decade and played a major role in a number of court cases and political battles—was drafted not by an impartial committee of physicians, as both ACOG and the pro-abortion lobby claimed for years, but by Elena Kagan, who was then the deputy assistant to the president for domestic policy.
Kagan saw ACOG’s original paper, which did not include the claim that partial-birth abortion “may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman,” but, on the contrary, said that ACOG “could identify no circumstances under which this procedure . . . would be the only option to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.” She wrote a memo to two White House colleagues noting that this language would be “a disaster” for the cause of partial-birth abortion, and she then set out to do something about it. In notes released by the White House it now looks as though Kagan herself—a senior Clinton White House staffer with no medical background—proposed the “may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman” language, and sent it to ACOG, which then included that language in its final statement.
What’s described in these memos is easily the most serious and flagrant violation of the boundary between scientific expertise and politics I have ever encountered. A White House official formulating a substantive policy position for a supposedly impartial physicians’ group, and a position at odds with what that group’s own policy committee had actually concluded? You have to wonder where all the defenders of science—those intrepid guardians of the freedom of inquiry who throughout the Bush years wailed about the supposed politicization of scientific research and expertise—are now.