jump to navigation

I Hate It When This Happens June 30, 2010

Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Here

Color Me Surprised June 30, 2010

Posted by Benjamin Wendell in Entertainment, Scandals.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Vienna Girardi Posing For Playboy

Well, what else was she going to do once her application for a doctorate in astrophysics at MIT was rejected?  If this doesn’t work out, there’s always jello wrestling with Kate Gosselin.  Hey, a girl’s got to make a living somehow.

BW

Oh Baby! Who’s Your Daddy? June 30, 2010

Posted by Benjamin Wendell in News Of The Weird.
Tags: , ,
5 comments

Sometimes I just sit down on a bench at the mall, watch the passersby, and wonder how we, as a species, continue to reproduce.  Here’s a prime example: Noisy sex woman spared jail term – And Finally, Frontpage – Independent.ie  If you read that headline and had visions of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt swinging from the trapezes in the French villa, think again:

I’m guessing that most of the screams were things like, “Can’t these damned lights go any lower??”  I’m just sayin’…

BW

Conservatism In America June 30, 2010

Posted by Benjamin Wendell in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Be afraid, be very very afraid.  My blogmate likes to talk about how he used to be a liberal Democrat but got out when the party was hijacked by lunatics (or words to that effect).  He might like to have you believe that American conservatism is now the province of serious intellectual thinkers like George Will and Victor David Hanson, representing the legacy of William F. Buckley.  Nonsense.  American conservatism’s shining light is Sarah Palin and their intellectual spine is composed of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Bill O’Reilly.  The golden boys are Rand Paul and Scott Brown.  The party of Lincoln has devolved into the Tea Party.  Conservatism in America, circa 2010, is thinly veiled racism, xenophobia, homophobia, misogyny, violent rhetoric, and repeated intimations of armed insurrection.  It’d be funny if it wasn’t getting terrifying.  Check this out: KTAR.com – Political Ad: Lady with a gun Play the video…the one of the candidate emptying the clip of an automatic assault rifle: “Pamela Gorman, Conservative Christian…and a pretty fair shot”.  That’s what passes for conservative discourse in 2010, and these are the representatives they’re trying to send to Congress.  Not convinced?  Check this one: Ruth Marcus: Unhinged on the Right – Truthdig Play the Rick Barber video, the one that compares the health care reform bill to Nazi death camps and American slavery, the one that starts with an antique pistol sitting on his desk.  What do you suppose all this gun imagery is about?  No implied threat, right?  This is the money quote from the Ruth Marcus piece:

Another, and the reason it is worth paying attention to Barber, is: emblematic. Emblematic of the dangerous take-back-our-country rhetoric that is spread on the conservative airwaves and fueling the tea partyers. Barber may be on the outer edges of this movement but he is not alone there, and he is a predictable outgrowth of it.

If you haven’t spent any time listening to conservative talk radio, you will probably be surprised by the white-hot vehemence of the commentary. The concern and disagreement—over health care legislation, over bank bailouts, over debt—are understandable; the slippery-slope fears of descent into socialism/totalitarianism are incomprehensible. Last I looked, our checks and balances seemed pretty firmly anchored. 

Yet it does not take much to imagine the leap from bellicose talk to action for those who sincerely believe that the country they love is being wrested from them. They are delusional but passionate, and they are whipped daily by the Limbaughs and Hannitys and Becks into a frenzy of fear. 

Sarah Palin accuses the media of overreacting to her “don’t retreat—reload” approach. But it is hardly surprising when Sharron Angle, the Nevada Republican nominee for Senate, then warns that “If this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies.” Or when Ohio Republican John Boehner, the House minority leader, accuses Democrats of “snuffing out the America that I grew up in,” and warns, “There’s a political rebellion brewing, and I don’t think we’ve seen anything like it since 1776.”

You don’t suppose this has anything to do with a black president being in office, do you?  These people like to pick and choose their Constitutional amendments, just like they like to pick and choose bible verses to support any particularly onerous position they happen to support.  They like the second amendment, but aren’t so crazy about the first or the fourth.  They warn of Sodom and Gomorrah, but they don’t much like the admonition to turn the other cheek.  These people worry me.  Just like the jihadists, they’ve got god on their side.  Be afraid, be very very afraid.

BW

Release My Chakra June 30, 2010

Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.
1 comment so far

I look at it differently- could anyone actually make that up?

It’s A Hundred Bucks More For A Happy Ending June 30, 2010

Posted by Benjamin Wendell in Politics, Scandals.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

That article on Al Gore and the masseuse is pretty damning stuff, and just like similar pieces on other politicians in The Star and The Enquirer, may very well turn out to be true.  Even if it’s only partially true, it certainly sheds a little light on why Tipper might have decided that forty years was plenty, thank you very much.  But the accusations in the report also force one to accept that Al Gore, who is not only a Nobel laureate but a billionaire, is also a complete idiot.  With one phone call to any of hundreds of escort services listed in the yellow pages of every major city in America, he could have had a massage with a happy ending, or a wide variety of other services, up to and including an orgy featuring Russian acrobats and French dwarves.  All he needed was a credit card.  Instead, we are asked to believe that he chose to force himself on an unsuspecting professional masseuse with pleas of “Release my chakra”?  I’m a little skeptical.

BW

Geezers Rule! June 30, 2010

Posted by Benjamin Wendell in reader interaction.
4 comments

Well, my young colleague once again beat me to the punch.  I guess the reflexes are just a bit quicker at 56 than 57.  Some things never change, though.  I’m the elder statesman of the group and I still get no respect.  Happy freaking birthday to the both of us…and oh yeah, happy six days since birth to the most gorgeous grandson in the history of babies (if that doesn’t clinch my geezerdom, nothing will.)

BW

Just Suck It Up! June 30, 2010

Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.
add a comment

This gives new meaning to “taking one for the team”

HFB! June 30, 2010

Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.
add a comment

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO US
Two old geezers – but I continue to remain one year younger than old Gramps.

Remember How The Bush White House Politicized Science? June 29, 2010

Posted by Cory Franklin in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Apparently they weren’t the only ones:
From NRO (Shannon Coffen):
It seems that the most important statement in the famous position paper of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists—a 1996 document that was central to the case of partial-birth-abortion defenders for the subsequent decade and played a major role in a number of court cases and political battles—was drafted not by an impartial committee of physicians, as both ACOG and the pro-abortion lobby claimed for years, but by Elena Kagan, who was then the deputy assistant to the president for domestic policy.
Kagan saw ACOG’s original paper, which did not include the claim that partial-birth abortion “may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman,” but, on the contrary, said that ACOG “could identify no circumstances under which this procedure . . . would be the only option to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.” She wrote a memo to two White House colleagues noting that this language would be “a disaster” for the cause of partial-birth abortion, and she then set out to do something about it. In notes released by the White House it now looks as though Kagan herself—a senior Clinton White House staffer with no medical background—proposed the “may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman” language, and sent it to ACOG, which then included that language in its final statement.
What’s described in these memos is easily the most serious and flagrant violation of the boundary between scientific expertise and politics I have ever encountered. A White House official formulating a substantive policy position for a supposedly impartial physicians’ group, and a position at odds with what that group’s own policy committee had actually concluded? You have to wonder where all the defenders of science—those intrepid guardians of the freedom of inquiry who throughout the Bush years wailed about the supposed politicization of scientific research and expertise—are now.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers